Media RoomPublications & ProductsEducation & MeetingsMember ServicesAbout AAMS
Public_Policy_Public_Affairs
 
Member Services
 E-Communities
 AAMS Classifieds
 Products or Services for Medical Transport
 ADAMS Database
 Annual Awards
 Public Policy/Public Affairs
 Links of Interest
 Research
 Safety
 Membership Task Force
            
Print this page  Print this page
Text Only Site

Public Policy / Public Affairs

FAA OpSpec A021 Changes, Future Rulemaking Initiative
NTSB’s Most Wanted List, Upcoming Hearings
Congressional Interest, Possible Hearings
Medicare Bill Moves through Congress
AAMS Supports Expansion of the Public Safety Officer Benefit Program
Senator Cantwell Introduces New Air Medical Safety Bill

FAA OpSpec A021 Changes, Future Rulemaking Initiative
The FAA has proposed changes to both Operations Specifications (OpSpecs) A021, Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Operations, and A050, Helicopter Night Vision Goggle Operations.

View the Federal Register Notice on the current proposed changes to Operations Specification A021and A050 - click here.
Download the proposed changes to Operations Specification A021 - click here.
Download the proposed changes to Operations Specification A050 - click here.

The following is a description of these change from the Federal Register dated Friday, November 14, 2008:

The FAA has determined that safety in air commerce and the public interest requires additional hazard mitigation for HEMS operations, and therefore has revised Operations Specifications A021 and A050 pursuant to 14 CFR 119.51.

The A021 revisions specify that if a flight, or sequence of flights, includes a part 135 segment then all visual flight rules (VFR) segments of the flight must be conducted within the weather minimums and minimum safe cruise altitude determined in pre-flight planning. Specifically, A021 requires pilots to identify a minimum safe cruise altitude during pre-flight planning by identifying and documenting obstructions and terrain along the planned flight path. HEMS pilots must also determine the minimum required ceiling and visibility to conduct the flight using the revised weather minimums contained in A021.

Revised Operations Specification A021 also permits HEMS instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at landing areas without weather reporting if an approved weather reporting source is located within 15 nautical miles of the landing area or if an area forecast is available.

Revised Operations Specification A050 changes weather minimums for HNVGO conducted in Class G Airspace to be consistent with changes made to the Class G Airspace minimums in A021.

The full text of the changes to Operations Specifications A021 and A050 are available on the FAA Web site and on http://www.regulations.gov as discussed above.

AAMS will submit comments to the FAA before the December 14th deadline. AAMS members are also encouraged to submit their comments to the FAA directly at www.regulations.com.  If you have any questions please contact Christopher Eastlee at ceastlee@aams.org.

Also available on the website are slides from a presentation made by Dennis Pratte, Manager of the FAA’s AFS-250 office, regarding both the OpSpec changes and long term plans to address several issues with a formal rulemaking. Among those issues may be some requirement for helicopter terrain alert warning systems (H-TAWS), and devices that would perform the function of recording flight data and voice communication. These recording devices may include video or software based devices that are currently available but do not meet the current “Cockpit Voice and Flight Data Recorder” definitions at the FAA, which refer to specific devices often found in large fixed wing aircraft. To view the presentation, click here


NTSB’s Most Wanted List, Upcoming Hearings
During a public meeting on Tuesday, October 28th, the NTSB voted unanimously to add air medical safety, and their 2006 safety recommendations, to the NTSB’s Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements for Aviation. The NTSB also announced plans to hold a three day hearing on air medical safety beginning on February 3rd of 2009.

Click here for a copy of the presentation made to the Safety Board at that meeting.

The NTSB also voted to move three of the four air medical recommendations to “open, unacceptable response”; greatly increasing the pressure on the FAA to address the recommendations through rulemaking. Those recommendations are as follows:

  • Conduct all flights with medical crew on board in accordance with commuter aircraft regulations.
  • Develop and implement flight risk evaluation programs.
  • Install terrain awareness and warning systems on aircraft. 

The following recommendation was left as an “open, acceptable response” based on the activity of the FAA to address the issue:

  • Require formalized dispatch and flight following procedures including up-to-date weather information.

The Board further announced plans for their three day hearing on air medical service safety, and discussed some of the many topics they wish to cover in that informational hearing. Initial plans for the  hearing call for the inclusion of witnesses and safety experts from the air medical community, including aviation operators, medical personnel, researchers, FAA officials, and state EMS officials. The topics range from aviation procures to safety equipment, training practices and pilot experience, and issues created by competition and the financial reimbursement of air medical services. While it is possible that this hearing could result in further safety recommendations by the Board, the informational nature of this hearing is very different than the 2006 hearing which did not include witness testimony or the availability of questions or comments from air medical professionals.


Congressional Interest, Possible Hearings
Congressional interest in air medical safety is especially prominent, especially from members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. While AAMS regularly keeps Congressional members informed of activities, especially those related to safety, key members of Congress grow more concerned on these issues in recent weeks. As noted previously, Ranking Member John Mica of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has requested that committee hold hearings on air medical safety in the next Congress. To see the letter from Ranking Member Mica to Chairman Jim Oberstar of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, follow this link.


Air Medical Services: future development as an integrated component of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System: a guidance document by the Air Medical Task Force of the National Association of State EMS Officials, National Association of EMS Physicians, and Association of Air Medical Services.
Prehospital Emergency Care. 2007 Oct-Dec; 11(4):353-68.


For the portion of H.R. 6331 concerning Air Medical Services, click here.

Medicare Bill Moves through Congress
The Congress passed the Medicare Improvement Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) on July 15th over the President’s veto. The bill included two provisions specific to air medical services:

  • An 18 month hold-harmless for air medical services negatively affected by changes to the urban/rural coding of certain transports. This is hold-harmless will begin on July 1st, 2008, and end on December 31st, 2009, and will reimburse zip codes that were previously considered rural but now considered urban at the previous rural rate.
  • A technical change that helps to clarify previously passed legislation outlining who may be authorized to call for air medical transport. The intent of this change is to reduce the number of audits to Medicare claims, especially when a physician or other medically trained individual is willing to certify, even after the transport has taken place, that they made the request.

AAMS has met with CMS on the implementing these changes in CMS policy and CMS will need some time to implement the policy changes. It has already been established that CMS will task the carriers with the responsibility of providing payments to providers based on the zip code hold-harmless retroactively to July 1, 2008. Both changes, although technical, should provide some reimbursement relief, especially in those areas negatively affected by the zip code change.


AAMS Supports Expansion of the Public Safety Officer Benefit Program
Congressman Keith Ellison (D- MN 5th) introduced legislation that would extend benefits offered by the Department of Justice to public safety officers killed or injured in the line of duty to public safety officers who may be employed by the private sector.

  • The bill, H.R. 3822, was introduced on October 12th by Congressman Ellison after requests from the Minnesota ambulance community following the numerous efforts undertaken by both public and private EMS services surrounding the Minneapolis bridge collapse earlier this year.
  • AAMS, along with numerous other organizations representing various facets of the EMS community, including the American Ambulance Association (AAA) and the International Association of Flight Paramedics (IAFP), supports this legislation through the Congressional Air Medical Caucus and individual lobbying efforts.

                    Issue: Support the extension of public safety officer benefits to the
                          employees of private services by passing the Public Safety
                          Officer Benefit extension bill, H.R. 3822.

                   Action: AAMS members are encouraged to contact their local 
                          congressional representative and ask him or her to co-
                          sponsor H.R. 3822, or ask that office to contact Christopher 
                          Eastlee directly at (703) 836-8732 for more information. 

For a copy of this bill, H.R. 3822, click here.


For a copy of S. 3229, click here.
For a copy of H.R. 3939, click here.
Presentation on Safety Bills and Statusclick here.

Senator Cantwell Introduces New Air Medical Safety Bill, S. 3229
Senator Cantwell (D-WA) introduced S. 3229, a bill to increase the safety of the crew and passengers in air ambulances, on July 8, 2008; the bill, freestanding legislation based on amendments to Section 508 of S. 1300, was released the day the Senate returned to Washington following the tragic mid-air collision of two air medical helicopters in Flagstaff, AZ.

The following is a copy Senator Cantwell’s prepared remarks:
 
“I come to the floor today to ask for my colleagues’ support for the Air Medical Service Safety Improvement Act of 2008, a measure that redefines our commitment to improving the safety for the flight crews, flight nurses, and passengers aboard emergency air medical service helicopters and fixed wing aircraft.
 
“These EMS aviation operations provide an important service to the public by transporting seriously ill patients or donor organs to emergency care facilities. Each year, on average, air medical companies transport about 350,000 patients by helicopter and 100,000 by fixed wing aircraft.
 
“Providing emergency air medical service is dangerous work. And, unfortunately, we have been reminded of this fact all too many times this year, most recently by the tragic crash in Arizona. 
 
“I first became involved in the issue of emergency air medical service safety when an EMS helicopter crashed near my hometown in Washington state.  On September 29, 2005, an Airlift Northwest EMS transport helicopter crashed into the waters of Puget Sound at Browns Bay, just north of Edmonds, Washington. On board were pilot Steve Smith, and nurses Erin Reed and Lois Suzuki. There were no survivors. Over time, I have communicated with both Erin’s mother and sister about their loss.
 
“The cause of the crash remains unknown.
 
“All we do know is that three people dedicated to saving lives were lost in the Sound that night. And sadly, their story is not uncommon.
 
“According to a study by Johns Hopkins University, one in four medical helicopters will crash during its 15 years of service.  In just the last six months, there have been nine medical helicopter crashes and 16 deaths.
 
“This alarming epidemic of accidents has opened the eyes of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), National Transportation Safety Board,(NTSB) and policymakers in recent days.   But the recent spike in accidents is not a new trend. In fact, between January 2002 and January 2005, there were 55 crashes of medical helicopters. On January 25, 2006, the NTSB released a report identifying recurring gaps in safety that must be addressed, including:

  • Less stringent requirements for emergency medical operations conducted without patients on board;
  • A lack of aviation flight risk-evaluation programs;
  • A lack of consistent, comprehensive flight dispatch procedures; and
  • No requirements to use technologies such as terrain awareness and warning systems that have the power to enhance flight safety.

“At my request, Section 508 of S.1300, a bill to reauthorize the FAA incorporated the NTSB recommendations for addressing these gaps. Subsequent to that bill’s introduction in the spring of 2007, I had the opportunity to discuss with stakeholders how to improve upon the language. The bill I am introducing today is essentially the amendment I filed this May when the FAA reauthorization bill was on the floor. Given the uncertain status of that legislation, and in light of the recent events, I felt the urgency to transform the amendment into standalone legislation.
 
“This bill will implement new procedures and improve standards already in place through strengthened safety requirements, comprehensive flight dispatch and flight following procedures, improved situation awareness of helicopter air crews, and better data available to NTSB investigators at crash sites.
 
“It is time to put black boxes in these helicopters.
 
“It is time to require the same safety standards regardless of whether or not a patient is on board.
 
“It is time to evaluate potential risks before take-off.
 
“It is time to improve the situational awareness of air medical flight crews.
 
“If not, we are bound to witness more tragedies.
 
“I am committed to these changes and I ask my colleagues to lend their support in making the skies safer for the men and women who dedicate their lives to getting critically injured patients the medical attention they need.
 
“Thank you, and I yield the floor.”

This bill now joins a slightly different House bill, H.R. 3939. AAMS supports the passage of H.R. 3939 as an alternative to previously harsh requirements in S. 1300. AAMS members are still considering the provisions in the new Senate bill.

Those provisions are:

  • All air medical services (fixed wing and rotor, public and private) must observe Part 135 Rules regarding weather and pilot duty times whenever medical crew is aboard; making appropriate exemptions to Part 135 weather requirements in order to continue IFR operations.
  • Requires the use of pre-flight risk assessments.
  • Requires a training standard for air medical communications specialists.
  • Requires the equipage of devices that perform the function of terrain warning on all new helicopters ordered after the enactment of the act before the enter air medical service. Devices must meet a minimum standard for helicopters as directed by the Administrator.
  • Requires a study of devices that perform the function of recording voice communications and flight data information; requires that the FAA make a rule requiring such devices (based on a timeline developed by the study.

While the legislation makes positive strides towards requiring safety improvements for all air medical services, there are several technical changes that AAMS would like Congress to consider. Among these changes is the possibility of increasing Medicare reimbursement rates to help offset the costs of new equipage requirements, or changing the current fee schedule to provide for higher reimbursement rates for those aircraft that opt for equipment advances, like H-TAWS or NVG’s. AAMS remains engaged with Senator Cantwell, and other lawmakers, on these changes.

With both chambers in recess for the month of August, and a short September session planned due to the upcoming elections, it is unlikely that this legislation will move this year; however, it is very likely that this legislation will reappear in the next Congress. This give AAMS and its partner organizations time to refine it position on the legislation, and suggest additions to increase safety and support the air medical mission.